Museum of Bavarian History Competition Entry / Mauro Turin Architectes

Taking advantage of the competition site’s strengths, this proposal by Mauro Turin Architectes for the Museum of Bavarian History features, on urban terms, a system that serves as a liaison between the banks of the river and the old urban fabric of the city. While do so, the project also acts as an articulation of urban spaces through its various places and passage, creating a symbolic point of convergence. More images and architects’ description after the break.

The competition sitefor the Museum of History in Bavaria takes advantage of a privileged position in the city of Regensburg, UNESCO World Heritage Site; it is both part of a unique built environment with a medieval character while facing the majestic river Danube.

The volume of theMuseum is crossed at its lower levels by a large portico in order to create a stepped passage that leads gently passer-by towards an urban space to another. It is used in a bidirectional manner; it attracts to the river landscape and invites to discover the city. 

With its precise urban position and strong stature, the Museum is an undeniable attraction with a firmly institutional character.

Architects: Mauro Turin Architectes
Location: Regensburg. Germany
Team: Mauro Turin, Magdalena Lewczyk, Iñigo Oregui, Martine Laprise
Client: Regensburg City/State of Bavaria
Gross Floor Area: 20,000 m2
Competition Status: Honorable Mention
Year: 2013

Museum of Bavarian History Competition Entry / Mauro Turin Architectes Courtesy of Mauro Turin Architectes
Museum of Bavarian History Competition Entry / Mauro Turin Architectes Courtesy of Mauro Turin Architectes
Museum of Bavarian History Competition Entry / Mauro Turin Architectes Courtesy of Mauro Turin Architectes
Museum of Bavarian History Competition Entry / Mauro Turin Architectes Courtesy of Mauro Turin Architectes
Museum of Bavarian History Competition Entry / Mauro Turin Architectes Courtesy of Mauro Turin Architectes
Museum of Bavarian History Competition Entry / Mauro Turin Architectes Courtesy of Mauro Turin Architectes
Museum of Bavarian History Competition Entry / Mauro Turin Architectes Courtesy of Mauro Turin Architectes
Museum of Bavarian History Competition Entry / Mauro Turin Architectes Courtesy of Mauro Turin Architectes

Museum of Bavarian History Competition Entry / Mauro Turin Architectes originally appeared on ArchDaily, the most visited architecture website on 23 May 2013.

send to Twitter | Share on Facebook | What do you think about this?

Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi

Conceived to aid in the cohesion between people, Salotto Urbano is a public area designed by architects Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, and David Vecchi. The project aims to be a pleasant place to support the social interactions, working as a structure for several activities and events. It is a space where people can freely operate and get back the participation of common good. More images and architects’ description after the break.

The proposal includes three main actions and each one is developed with the aim to reinforce the natural site peculiarity:

-The square system arranged in detached functional areas planned in accordance with existing greenery and devised in polyvalent way.
-The insertion of “Social trees” in correspondence of functional areas previously recognised, excluded the north square area designed for events during holydays, for example the Sunday market. This part, during working days, is characterized by water gushes to commemorate the “Ninfeo” memory, the architecture inside neighbouring  “Villa Doria Pamphili”
-The pool hall requalification, through the use of the portal in front of main building. The structure, represent, an iconic way to the square, as well as, optically, mark a fast track crosswalk direction of itself.

The square design is planned based on two different purposes. The first one is social and aspires to produce activity, the second one has environmental reason directed to external bioclimatic upgrade. Moreover, the “Social trees” are imagined as slight systems energetically self-sufficient. Each element is composed by perimetral structures with a second structure hooked into. It is formed by metal grid that support American grapevine (Partenocissus quinquefolia): a falling leaf climbing plant, easy to cultivate and characterized by the different look depending on the season. The use of this kind of vegetation lends to the structures an aesthetic aspect always variable.

The photovoltaic panels, concealed above the highest part of metal partition, supply electrical energy for square lighting system. During the sunset time, the areas subjected to vandalism as the pool hall or the area designed for children pastime will be closed with shutters. All the other accessible areas are made secure through the use of suitable led  lightings system to guarantee the area accessibility.

Architects: Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi
Location: Carlo Forlanini Square, Italy
Collaborator: Simona Fazio
Client: Officina06, XVI Municipio Roma
Year: 2012

Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi Courtesy of Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi Courtesy of Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi Courtesy of Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi Courtesy of Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi © Officina 06
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi plan 01
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi plan 02
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi elevation
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi section
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi diagram 01
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi diagram 02
Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi diagram 03

Salotto Urbano Proposal / Michela Romano, Emanuela Ortolani, Federica Spinaci, Eleonora Sanfilippo, David Vecchi originally appeared on ArchDaily, the most visited architecture website on 23 May 2013.

send to Twitter | Share on Facebook | What do you think about this?

Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects

Designed by EFFEKT + Henning Larson Architects, in collaboration with Marianne Levinsen Landscape and Moe consulting engineers, Vinge is set to be a brand new town planned in the scenic natural surroundings just 30 minutes from Copenhagen. A large project both on the regional and international level, Vinge will house around 10.000 residents and employ 4.000 people. The city will have its own train station and a new highway will take its residents rapidly to and from Copenhagen. More images and architects’ description after the break.

With its 350 hectares, Vinge is currently the largest urban development in Denmark. The life of Vinge revolves around a central park space, The Green Heart, uniting the best of two worlds: Urban life and services with a scenic location and recreational environments. The Green Heart is a unique urban space that integrates nature, urban life and pedestrian infrastructure. Here, the city’s residents gather for recreation, shopping, sports and other activities. School and childcare centers; sports clubs and club houses are all arranged around The Green Heart – and are in close proximity to the train station. 

The Green Heart is a new type of urban space that unites the city’s pedestrian circulation and public transport with urban functions in order to create a unique base for city life, activities and communities.

Vinge is planned to have a dense city structure with high rise buildings near the station. As the proximity to the station decreases so does the density of the urban fabric, giving way to a smaller, more intimate, townhouse scale.

Rather than the traditional suburb the city is to hold different types of relatively dense low rise typologies with small gardens and large common areas. The Green Heart serves as the city’s community garden where city life can unfold.  Along the perimeter of the city the structure merges with the surrounding landscape. This results in a city with unique encounters between landscape and settlement – both in the center and along the edges. The dense urban fabric creates a vibrant urban environment, while landscape and nature is always present.

The project was developed for the municipality of Frederikssund and accepted unanimously by the city council on May 8th 2013. Vinge forms part of the Finger Plan developed for Copenhagen in 1947. Introducing a city with its own train station on the ‘Frederikssund finger’ we are writing a new chapter in the history of the Finger Plan development. This makes it an exceptional chance to develop the concept for future railway towns in the Denmark. 

Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects Courtesy of EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects Courtesy of EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects Courtesy of EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects Courtesy of EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects Courtesy of EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects Courtesy of EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects masterplan 01
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects masterplan 02
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects diagram 01
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects diagram 02
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects diagram 03
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects diagram 04
Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects diagram 05

Vinge Masterplan Proposal / EFFEKT + Henning Larsen Architects originally appeared on ArchDaily, the most visited architecture website on 22 May 2013.

send to Twitter | Share on Facebook | What do you think about this?

‘Harvest’ Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA

Developed by architects AHA+ and Solbjor Arkitekter, their ‘Harvest’ proposal was announced as one of the four finalists in the international competition Nordic Built Challenge for an extension of Postgirobygget, an existing high-rise building in Oslo. Going beyond BG14 and the refurbishment of Posthuset, their concept aims at becoming a new and innovative way to meet the challenges of tomorrow while ensuring financial and practical viability. More images and architects’ description after the break.

Our proposal provides a strategy that focuses on 3 main issues: How to expand existing building in most sustainable way on a small almost non existing site in a dense urban location; How to reconnect existing building to its surroundings and create new and attractive entrance; How to create a low threshold + active energy system that utilise the local and existing energy resources in the best possible way. By giving the right answers to these issues we create preconditions for optimized C2C strategy and enhance the flexibility of the office space in the building.

In order to balance costs with economic robustness we propose to expand the building on the north side of the BG14. This is the only rational and possible place to expand existing BG14 building. From existing 2000 working places we have created possibility for in total approx. 5000 working spaces and 21.000m2 additional spaces. Our proposal is to build highest wooden building structure in the world. This has some obvious environmental benefits but also strengthens iconic quality of the BG14 and creates new and global marketing possibilities. Wooden addition to existing building enhance It’s functionality, makes it smart and aesthetically appealing, a building in the best of the Nordic design tradition. We constructive studies believe this to be possible within existing technology.

Immediate urban surrounding of the entrance plaza is arguably one of Central Oslo’s most inhospitable seen from a pedestrian point of view. The entrance plaza is flanked by barriers. Fences, tramlines, a motorway and a huge roundabout bar pedestrian access. The street-fronts of the next-door neighbors are forbidding, isolating the BG14 entrance effectively from the teeming Central Station Plazas. Pedestrians are largely forced to use footbridges or underpasses. Our project proposes a NEW and inviting entrance area, that reconnects BG14 building to the neighbouring buildings and provide NEW and attractive mall address and public space.

Posthuset is not a conventional building. No ground areas are available for energy production; neither does the building have a large roof area. Is it possible to design house that is producer of energy? How to harvest and reuse energy that is generated by the use of the building its self and in the interaction between building and the elements? Biggest challenge is always not to produce enough energy but to manage to store it so that it can be used later. Our project proposes solution that makes this possible with “low threshold” technological solutions. By utilizing local resources and adapting to a local climatic condition we create possibility to achieve ambitious environmental and energy goals.

The proposed Active House Concept harvests energy. It feeds on excess heat trapped in the building as well as ambient energy at optimal times by means of storage techniques adapted to local conditions and opportunities. This is done to supply in situ renewable energy when most needed. The technology underpinning the concept is an energy-efficient and renewable energy system based on a unique dynamic thermal energy storage technology and an optimized control system.

The real challenge lies in proposing solutions that radically improve environmental performance while balancing costs with market willingness. We propose new facade solution based on cross laminated timber technology that will help owners to achieve zero emissions over its lifecycle. This choice of material not only on new part of the building but also on the existing facades towards south, east and west will improve reduction in carbon emissions for energy, materials and transportation. Our proposal enhances but also optimises the access of daylight in to the building. Developing further on some of the existing principles we propose solution that allows for variation on the glass surface area depending on orientation of the building. Total amount of glass area proposed in the wooden wall elements is on average around 25% of the facade surface. 

BG14 has a large number of identical floors. With the proposed expansion of the building we optimize the floor plans in terms of area efficiency. We create flexible office space that can either be easily divided between various tenants or utilized by one larger tenant. If floors are used as mainly cell office plans we achieve approx 40 m2 per working place, 11 m2 for landscape office plans and for combination of these two we achieve 15 m2 per working space.

'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA Courtesy of AHA+ and SAAHA
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA Courtesy of AHA+ and SAAHA
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA Courtesy of AHA+ and SAAHA
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA Courtesy of AHA+ and SAAHA
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA site plan
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA ground floor plan 01
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA ground floor plan 02
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA plan 01
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA plan 02
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA plan 03
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA plan 04
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA plan 05
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA plan 06
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA west and north elevations
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA east and south elevations
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA section 01
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA section 02
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA section 03
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA concept diagram 01
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA concept diagram 02
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA facade system diagram
'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA flexibility diagram

'Harvest' Nordic Built Challenge Finalist Proposal / AHA+ and SAAHA originally appeared on ArchDaily, the most visited architecture website on 22 May 2013.

send to Twitter | Share on Facebook | What do you think about this?

Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects

Designed by PM²G Architects, in collaboration with Satellite Architectes & Menu Design, their iconic proposal project for a new cultural center in Guadalajara embodies and catalyzes the cultural scene over the Chapultepec Avenue besides forming a new attraction for the city. Their design, which was awarded an honorable mention, includes a series of three alternate solids that are combined with transparent and concave spaces. The rotation of the volumes towards the sky gives the building its dynamic and spectacular force. More images and architects’ description after the break.

Guadalajara is known as the 2nd most populous municipality in Mexico and the well-known vertical architectural route of the Guggenheim Museum in New York is reinterpreted here in the new Chapultepec Cultural Center project. In this case, however, unlike the Frank Lloyd Wright scheme, the route turns to the city and thus provides visitors a 360° view of the city of Guadalajara.

A monumental staircase, “part of the tradition of Mexican pre-Hispanic architecture” evokes the ascension into heaven, allowing to wander the building and at the same time serving as a podium and terrace to display certain works of art; this possibility extends from the inside out, becoming an external tour and concluding with a panoramic terrace, the stair as a magical space to exhibit, contemplate and communicate, a walk in the pleasant climate of Guadalajara.

The exhibition halls, including 300 and 500 m² spaces, are composed by generous spaces with great heights designed to accommodate different types of art. Going from the White Cube hosting classical painting and photography exhibitions where lighting is indirect and natural. Moreover, the Black Box designed as a space for video projection and installations.

The auditorium space has been designed to offer great flexibility to adapt to all kinds of shows, dance and theater as well as conferences, workshops and projections. The retractable seating once extended offers optimum visibility for each of the 200 spectators, and releases the space when retracting (disappear) in the back of the room, thus becoming an ideal place for concerts, and more. The stage is slightly elevated, the backstage space has comfortable dimensions and can be opened to the auditorium in the case of major events that require it; addition to this, a small room to be used by the entire production team completes the device.

The white concrete poetic facade is composed by a series of ruled surfaces perforated in a dotted evolutionary pattern, in some cases, the perforations as windows, others as mirrors and some cases as luminous LED spots. Thus, the facade is crafted to reflect the sky with a gradient from top to bottom, revealing an evolutionary play of light throughout the day. Beyond the monumental staircase, visitors have easy access to each level through a vertical circulation core. The compact core is the backbone of the building and serves to effectively distribute the flow of people and cargo transportation.

The ground floor opens onto the city calling and inviting people to come to the inside; an entrance hall containing a ticket office, cloakroom and control, as well as a library and a small cafe are responsible for receiving public warmly. The access to the underground parking and the loading bay area are located on the minor street that faces the terrain, the last being directly connected to the freight elevator and warehouses for supply purposes.

The structural system of the building is composed of a concrete central core and a network of columns located with and offset of 6mts from the façade and intertwined by a series of cantilever metal beams of varying dimensions according to seismic requirements.

At last, on the top floor the architectural route culminates in a restaurant-terrace space, offering a unique view over the skyline of Guadalajara.

Architects: PM²G Architects
Location: Guadalajara, Mexico
Collaborators: Satellite Architectes & Menu Design
Project Team: Guillermo Lumbreras, Morgane Cauchy, Monique Bastos Nunes Herve, Sebastien Menu, Burkhardt Schiller, and Constantin Döhler
CG Artist: 3D Veron
Program Area: 5,000 sqm
Competition Status: Honorable Mention
Year: 2013

Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects Courtesy of PM²G Architects
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects Courtesy of PM²G Architects
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects Courtesy of PM²G Architects
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects Courtesy of PM²G Architects
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects site
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects ground floor plan
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects auditorium plan
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects exposition plan
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects restaurant and terrace plan
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects section
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects detailed section
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects program diagram
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects site diagram
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects extrusion of the site volume diagram
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects creation of public open space diagram
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects circulation in the monumental staircase diagram
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects structural principle diagram
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects continuation of public open space (terraces) diagram
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects panoramic view diagram
Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects competition panel

Cultural Center in Guadalajara Competition Entry / PM²G Architects originally appeared on ArchDaily, the most visited architecture website on 22 May 2013.

send to Twitter | Share on Facebook | What do you think about this?

Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio

Constructed for the Changwon Suclpture Biennale 2012 held in Changwon city, South Korea the Brick-Pod Pavilion defines architecture as ‘a sculpture with interior space’, and attempts to create a dome with black bricks which has been used for traditional architecture here in Korea. Designed by Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio, you can enjoy the breezing air, moving leafs, and sparkling sunshine through its numbers of the openings, feeling much more sensitive than when we are outside. More images and architects’ description after the break.

By using only 15mm thickness brack brick, we tried to make it not like a heavy and massive dome as usual masonry architecture does. The dome has a 4.5m hight, 3.3m diameter, 0nly 30 mm in thickness, which means it is much thinner than an egg shell which normally has 0.4mm on 40mm diameter.

The history of the dome architecture, represented with Pantheon in Rome, or Hagia Sofia in Istanbul, was the history of technical evaluation for pursuing the creation of the interior space to make it more bright and more ephemeral.

For the construction of the brick-pod, we used the ‘catalan vault’ technique, which is traditional the masonry technique that has been used for long centuries in Spain. First, we formed the dome shape by 15mm thick brick and then we applied glass fiber reinforced cement on it by the trowel which is the technique came from Japanese plastering. 

We can truly say this dome represents a new achievement of Korean brick architecture realized by the mixture of far east and far west construction technique on the Eurasia continent.

Architects: Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Location: Changwon, South Korea
Structural Consultant: Mitsuda structural consultant
Construction: Tatsuhei construccion + Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Materials: Black brick, fast-set cement, white cement, sand, grass fiber
Program: Open air sculpture
Total Area: 8.55 sqm
Year: 2012

Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio © Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio © Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio © Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio © Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio © Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio © Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio © Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio © Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio © Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio
Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio © Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio

Brick-Pod Pavilion / Kazuya Morita Architecture Studio originally appeared on ArchDaily, the most visited architecture website on 21 May 2013.

send to Twitter | Share on Facebook | What do you think about this?

NYC’s Midtown East: Rezoning and Streetscaping

New York City’s Midtown East will be facing a rezoning in the near future, bringing a dozen office towers into the already crowded neighborhood.  To help the Bloomberg Administration address the issues that may arise with this move, the city has hired sustainable real estate development firm, Jonathan Rose Co.; Dutch Urban Planning firm, Gehl Architects; and the global civil engineering firm, Skanska.  The different firms will be working to develop the streetscape to be known as the East Midtown Public Realm Vision Plan, which is scheduled for release later this year.

The rezoning of Midtown East will be a vast makeover of the neighborhood, covering 63 blocks stretching from East 39th Street to East 57th Street between Fifth and Third Avenues.  The Vision Plan comes as a response to the community board’s and local residents’ concerns over the quality of the development and the implications on the existing neighborhood’s development.  According to Crain’s New York, three workshops will be coordinated with the three participating firms and the city’s planning departments to establish guidelines for the final plan.  This will incorporate a public review process that takes the concerns into consideration.  City Councilman Daniel Garodnick says that the rezoning process is the right step toward a more inviting midtown, and hopes that the recommendations from the consultants will meet budgetary constrictions.

Drawing on design insight and concerns of the public realms through discussions and meetings with stakeholders, the consultants will develop a plan that will serve as a guide which will “feature design tools and action-oriented strategies for improving pedestrian access and other streetscape enhancements to encourage walking and active transportation”.

The new zoning maps will facilitate more office building in the area, increasing the allowable building size by 50 to 200%.  Matt Chaban of Crain’s New York writes that although the area is a premier spot for high rise office towers and a business district, only three towers have been constructed in the area in the past two decades.  These new zoning measures will help inspire more construction.  Developers who decide to take advantage of the redeveloped zoning rights will be able to buy air rights from private landlords or the city and help fund street improvements, which include widening Lexington and Madison Avenues and bringing a chain of public plazas to Vanderbilt Avenue.  Such developments will likely create a secondary business and entertainment district to Times Square, and will help balance the development that is slated for Midtown West.

Chabon points out that critics, locals and Garodnick himself argue that the rezoning is pre-emptive and the hiring of consultants for street improvements at the last minute is a sign that Mayor Bloomberg is trying to push through a last rezoning before leaving office.  With the street improvement plan set to come out in the fall, and the community board voting on the rezoning in June, it is unlikely that voters will have the details of the full scale of the project when making their decisions.  And while the plan for Midtown East’s development has been vague, NYC Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Kahn says that the DOT’s Sustaintable Streets strategic plan, Street Design Manual and World Class Streets study provide the guidelines for designing sustainable and inviting streets for the city’s many functions.

via NYC.gov and Crain’s New York

NYC's Midtown East: Rezoning and Streetscaping originally appeared on ArchDaily, the most visited architecture website on 21 May 2013.

send to Twitter | Share on Facebook | What do you think about this?

NYC’s Midtown East: Rezoning and Streetscaping

New York City’s Midtown East will be facing a rezoning in the near future, bringing a dozen office towers into the already crowded neighborhood.  To help the Bloomberg Administration address the issues that may arise with this move, the city has hired sustainable real estate development firm, Jonathan Rose Co.; Dutch Urban Planning firm, Gehl Architects; and the global civil engineering firm, Skanska.  The different firms will be working to develop the streetscape to be known as the East Midtown Public Realm Vision Plan, which is scheduled for release later this year.

The rezoning of Midtown East will be a vast makeover of the neighborhood, covering 63 blocks stretching from East 39th Street to East 57th Street between Fifth and Third Avenues.  The Vision Plan comes as a response to the community board’s and local residents’ concerns over the quality of the development and the implications on the existing neighborhood’s development.  According to Crain’s New York, three workshops will be coordinated with the three participating firms and the city’s planning departments to establish guidelines for the final plan.  This will incorporate a public review process that takes the concerns into consideration.  City Councilman Daniel Garodnick says that the rezoning process is the right step toward a more inviting midtown, and hopes that the recommendations from the consultants will meet budgetary constrictions.

Drawing on design insight and concerns of the public realms through discussions and meetings with stakeholders, the consultants will develop a plan that will serve as a guide which will “feature design tools and action-oriented strategies for improving pedestrian access and other streetscape enhancements to encourage walking and active transportation”.

The new zoning maps will facilitate more office building in the area, increasing the allowable building size by 50 to 200%.  Matt Chaban of Crain’s New York writes that although the area is a premier spot for high rise office towers and a business district, only three towers have been constructed in the area in the past two decades.  These new zoning measures will help inspire more construction.  Developers who decide to take advantage of the redeveloped zoning rights will be able to buy air rights from private landlords or the city and help fund street improvements, which include widening Lexington and Madison Avenues and bringing a chain of public plazas to Vanderbilt Avenue.  Such developments will likely create a secondary business and entertainment district to Times Square, and will help balance the development that is slated for Midtown West.

Chabon points out that critics, locals and Garodnick himself argue that the rezoning is pre-emptive and the hiring of consultants for street improvements at the last minute is a sign that Mayor Bloomberg is trying to push through a last rezoning before leaving office.  With the street improvement plan set to come out in the fall, and the community board voting on the rezoning in June, it is unlikely that voters will have the details of the full scale of the project when making their decisions.  And while the plan for Midtown East’s development has been vague, NYC Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Kahn says that the DOT’s Sustaintable Streets strategic plan, Street Design Manual and World Class Streets study provide the guidelines for designing sustainable and inviting streets for the city’s many functions.

via NYC.gov and Crain’s New York

NYC's Midtown East: Rezoning and Streetscaping originally appeared on ArchDaily, the most visited architecture website on 21 May 2013.

send to Twitter | Share on Facebook | What do you think about this?