An Elegant Firefighters Memorial That Can Grow Over Time

96d4953e copy

This project won the 2013 Architizer A+ Popular Choice Award in the Memorials category. See the full list of winners here.

When designing the Minnesota Fallen Firefighters Memorial, Leo A Daly relocated an existing statue to the capitol grounds in Saint. Paul. Using the old statue as a guide, the architect designed an elegant, minimal statue of weathering steel, which will start rusting over time, to honor the sacrifice of those firefighters killed in the line of duty. Click through for more!

5b8d9fb5

Through the rich materiality and transmission of historic information to visitors, the design seeks to convey the experiences and memory of those who have fallen. Evoking the oxidation of fire, the steel gradually changes to the distinct color of rust, and begins staining the ground around the memorial. This process, though subtle, calls to mind a powerful image of blood staining the area, inciting reflection and contemplation. A large monolith containing a cylindrical void hovers above the statue, allowing light to shine through, and provides a gathering area for meditation.

In total, a field of  86 slender columns holds up the monolithic roof, representing the number of years in which Minnesota firefighters have died in the line of duty. However, the design allows for additional columns to be installed, creating a living monument, rather than a static snapshot. At the time of completion, 791 names of firefighters were inscribed on the monument, honoring each person who gave their life. The inscriptions are oriented in the direction of the department where the firefighter served, and rise vertically in a chronological sequence. With it’s compelling use of materials, and powerful references and imagery, the memorial does an unparalleled job in honoring those brave firefighters with an undeniable delicacy and elegance.

709c8a3c

d8db0e60

A+ Finalist Spotlight: Religious Buildings

Voting for the A+ Public Choice Winners is plowing ahead across categories! Today we’re throwing the spotlight on contemporary religious buildings. Since the dawn of the built environment, structures reserved for religious functions have shaped the development of architecture. From the Egyptian temples at Luxor to Gothic cathedrals, religious structures have dominated the list of canonical buildings. Our five contemporary finalists range from woodland chapels to ritual bathing facilities, all united in their supporting role for religious worship. Click through to see them all!

Like what you see? Make sure to vote for your favorite project over at the A+ Public Voting site!

Mikve
Pascal Arquitectos
Mexico City, Mexico

De La Piedra Chapel
Nómena Arquitectos
Peru

Capilla del Lago
Di Vece Arquitectos
Zamora, Mexico

Garden Mausoleum at Lakewood Cemetery
HGA Architects
Minneapolis, United States

KISS
Z-A Studio
New York, United States

Hariri Memorial Garden
VDLA
Grand Serail, Lebanon

Minnesota Fallen Firefighters Memorial
Leo A Daly
Saint Paul, Minnesota

Patio 29 Memorial
Memopolis
Santiago, Chile

Canadian Figherfighters Memorial
PLANT Architect
Ottawa, Canada

Cemetery Marker
Kariouk Associates

Anti-Gehry Group Tests The Stuff Of The Eisenhower Memorial By Dumping Garbage On It

The battle continues between the National Civic Art Society (NCAS) and Frank Gehry’s Eisenhower Memorial design. When we last checked in, the Society was holding a forum to file yet another complaint against Gehry’s contemporary design for the downtown DC memorial. The Society has now gotten their hands on a report that alleges that the mesh tapestry components of the design may be a trap for loose garbage. The 572-page report, which can be dowloaded here, saw that wet toilet paper (as if there is tons of that flying around D.C.) was purposely stuck to the mesh for days, fraying some of it ends and discoloring pieces of steel wire. The Society considers this a small victory in their campaign and further “proof” that contemporary architecture really does suck.* Read more.

The NCAS has adamantly challenged the Gehry’s design for the better part of a year now. The group has been very unkind to the plan, which includes base reliefs, sculptures, and metal scrim walls, or “billboards” depending on who you’re talking to. Their latest ploy to drum up support for their cause consists of a materials test, the conclusions of which assert that the metal scrim is not only easily weathered but also a trap for “unsightly” debris. The trial involved embedding tissue paper and newspaper into a portion of the mesh mock-up by hand and leaving it for a number of days to become wet and hardened. Wet toilet paper was then applied on the surface of the scrim to further test its durability.

The “findings” only reaffirm the NCAS’s deep-seated belief that a national monument is not the “proper” testing ground for “untried experimental technology”. In the post, the group goes on to surmise that the material shortcomings of the metal scrim–which would enshroud the site and be visible from the Capitol and down Independence Avenue–is somehow characteristic of Gehry’s foolhardy approach to the application of similar experiments, as in the cases of the leaking roof at MIT’s Strata Center or the sun-tanning facade of the Walt Disney Opera House. What’s worse, the technical report has not yet been, nor probably will ever be concluded, says the Society, citing the fact that tests to ascertain the acidic effects of bird droppings on the scrim will most likely not be undertaken.

Does this test really prove anything? Would a stronger mesh material please the Civic Art Society? No, of course not. They won’t stop until they get what they’ve been asking for all this time: a complete redesign and, if possible, Gehry’s removal from the project. But, don’t worry about it, Frank, we’ve got your back.

*It doesn’t.

A Glowing Underground Village Pays Tribute To Buried Communities

Two architecture students from ETH Zurich, Bo Li and Ge Men, have just won first prize at the 2012 International Velux with their incredible fallen-village memorial. (Hey, maybe they can win an A+ Award, too!) Inspired by the real-life communities that have perished in landslides in the Swiss valleys, the pair have proposed an innovative way to commemorate these forgotten towns. Read more!

Using columns of transparent thermoplastic, Li and Men would map out a village grid above the ground by generating glowing house-shaped forms below the surface. The experience creates an abstract rendering of the village, for visitors to understand its general layout and presence rather than focusing on details. People can walk through buried rooms full of light that represent what once stood in that valley.

Photos: courtesy of VELUX

[via BLDGBLOG]

A Glowing Underground Village Pays Tribute To Buried Communities

Two architecture students from ETH Zurich, Bo Li and Ge Men, have just won first prize at the 2012 International Velux with their incredible fallen-village memorial. (Hey, maybe they can win an A+ Award, too!) Inspired by the real-life communities that have perished in landslides in the Swiss valleys, the pair have proposed an innovative way to commemorate these forgotten towns. Read more!

Using columns of transparent thermoplastic, Li and Men would map out a village grid above the ground by generating glowing house-shaped forms below the surface. The experience creates an abstract rendering of the village, for visitors to understand its general layout and presence rather than focusing on details. People can walk through buried rooms full of light that represent what once stood in that valley.

Photos: courtesy of VELUX

[via BLDGBLOG]

Kahn’s Vision Fulfilled: FDR Four Freedoms Park, A Tribute To New York

Photo: Paul Warchol

At the time of his death in 1974, Louis Kahn was in the midst of what was perhaps the most frenzied period of his career. His talents were spread far and wide throughout the world, from Bangladesh and Nepal to Israel and Iran, and, closer to home, California and New York. It was here that Kahn died anonymously in a Penn Station bathroom, while the plans and budget for the architect’s Roosevelt Memorial were under review. Nearly forty years later, after several false starts and failed campaigns, Kahn’s last completed project will finally open, thus inaugurating of the city’s great spaces. Continue.

The FDR Four Freedoms Park sits at the southernmost tip of Roosevelt Island, occupying a triangular plot four acres in area that floats above a foundation of riprap. The park, an austere white landform that rises from the middle of the East River, anchors what is currently a neglected, if relatively unexplored, neighborhood of the city. Kahn’s monolithic design is at once foreign and contextual, defined by a conceptual clarity that rises untethered from its industrial surroundings, while its thoughtful construction and exquisite execution grounds the project to the island’s bedrock.

A flight of ceremonial stairs herald the entrance to the elevated lawn, imploring the visitor to ascend the high mound and discover what surprises lay ahead. Battered granite walls on either side encase the tapered yard and its attendant banks of littleleaf linden trees, narrowing to a point in the manner of an arrowhead. The garden floor converges toward a central bust of the 32nd president, cast by Jo Davidson in 1933, and empties out onto a cobbled forecourt, where, passing through a second screen of trees, one finds themselves face to face with Roosevelt’s jutting chin.

To the right, the dramatic swell of skyscrapers trumpet a modernism at odds with Kahn’s, a tedious collage of corporate towers that serves as the backdrop to the architect’s near primitive massing of stone blocks. Continue past the enshrined effigy and enter into the “Room”, a 60-foot square open plaza bounded to the rear by the commemorative wall–the obverse of the sculpture niche and hand-etched with the lines Roosevelt’s eponymous speech–and to the sides by 36-ton granite cubes. Ahead, a window out onto the river and, if you squint, its eventual spillage into the sea.

Here, Kahn presents the viewer with a portal to the larger world, a stunning view of the city that would perhaps prove overwhelming were it not for the gentle crash of water and the languorous cries of cormorants nesting on nearby islets. The bluish-green slab of the United Nations looms to the southwest, standing testament to Roosevelt’s words and work. Perched at the edge of the island, with the water diverging on three sides, one feels a kinship to the city that only comes from such vantage points.

The “Room”; Photo: Paul Warchol

Yet, were it not for the efforts of organizers like William J. vanden Heuvel, the design would not have made it off the drawing boards (or canary yellow trace paper). Vanden Heuvel, the chair emeritus of the Franklin & Eleanor Roosevelt Institute and chairman of the Four Freedoms Park Conservancy, led a fundraising charge to find the $53 million needed to realize the project, and the park’s reverent completion can be largely attributed to his efforts. The city remains in his debt for his perseverance in bringing Kahn’s belated memorial to life.

Vanden Heuvel hopes that the park will serve as a “great public space for the teaching of American history”, and one couldn’t imagine a more appropriate mandate for Kahn’s vision. After all, architecture was for Kahn the great shaper of the civic realm, wherein the “dignity” of a building–and the intent it embodied–reflected that of its human occupants. The Four Freedoms Park more than fulfills its maker’s solemn promise.

Mudslinging Up Ahead: Critics Hosting Forum About Gehry’s Eisenhower Memorial Design

Debates in Washington D.C. are nothing new, but heated forums and mudslinging over an architectural monument is a whole other story. Next Tuesday, the National Civic Art Society will hold its next forum to discuss Frank Gehry’s design for the Eisenhower Memorial. This newest forum is the latest in a series of protestations over the past 6 months which has seen the group file complaint after complaint about the contemporary nature of Gehry’s plan. In a ‘Classicism vs. Modernism’ debate for the ages, the Eisenhower Memorial pits the National Civic Art Society and the late President’s family against one of the world’s most renowned architects. Read More.

Gehry’s latest design has already incorporated a number of changes requested by the Eisenhower family. Bas reliefs have been upgraded to statues and a monument of the President as a child has been changed to a more adult figure. Once the changes were made, the family was reportedly still unhappy. A metal scrim that floats along one wall proved problematic as it appeared to be the largest, most expensive, and seemingly fragile piece of the memorial.

Enter the National Civic Art Society– the conservative group held a forum back in May that was unkind to the Gehry plan, not uncharacteristic for a group that considers Maya Lin’s Vietnam Memorial a failure, and the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial, inappropriate because the effigy appears to be “sneering.”  The group ultimately found that Gehry’s design “shows unease with his subject’s greatness.”

The divide can be seen as a larger, ongoing issue of whether memorials should embrace modern architecture or adhere to the neo-classical aesthetic of Washington’s great monuments. Can respect and honor be fully conveyed through contemporary forms of expression? (Our response: Duh.) Many in opposition to the National Civic Art Society say their lack of confidence in modern memorials reflects a lack of confidence in America. We will have to see who prevails next Tuesday.

Awesome Quote About Zaha Hadid From ‘Memorial’

Image: Simon & Schuster via Bill Leone Bookseller

Bruce Wagner’s 2007 novel, Memorial, follows the story of Joan Herlihy, a female architect, and her family as they struggle to rise above unending adversity and tribulation. In the book, Herlihy competes to design a Tsunami Memorial in her town, and marks her process with caustic observations and self-depreciating despair. Memorial is notable not only for its compelling story, but also for the following quote about Zaha Hadid, the Queen of Architecture, in which Herlihy describes the architect with remarkable wit:

“How had this woman gotten so famous, anyway? She was even curating, no, ‘guest designing,’ the content of literary magazines. (Dopey sci-fi computer renderings that would have looked more at home on Wired subscription blow-ins.) Perhaps a paucity of female architects had dictated her arc…or the mere miracle that she’d managed, with grace and alacrity, to remove herself from King Koolhaas‘s shadow—a grand Chess Master’s trick, Joan had to admit…or her dramatic looks, the Baghdad-born thing, feminist warrior-ship masthead, unclassifiable geodesic goddess in a woman-killing theocracy, the sheer improbability of it, plus unkempt Fat Actress kohl-smeared gypsy-soprano factor that made her rock-star notable. Of course none of Joan’s acid observations interfered with the awareness she wanted to be Zaha; wanted books written on her own work, international forums centered around her own ideas, phantom or realized….But she (Joan) was still relatively young. That kind of momentum took time.”

The quote captures that duality present in the mental image many have of Zaha: a respectful awe of such a powerful woman in what unfortunately remains a man’s profession, tempered by the sense otherness fostered by her Tron-ish designs and Ursula-like affinities.

[via Unbeige]